Innovation processes in local food and energy production in Cuban municipalities

  • Jesús Suárez-Hernández Estación Experimental de Pastos y Forrajes Indio Hatuey, Universidad de Matanzas, Ministerio de Educación Superior Central España Republicana, CP 44280, Matanzas
  • Julio Ramiro Quevedo-Benkí Estación Experimental de Pastos y Forrajes Indio Hatuey, Universidad de Matanzas, Ministerio de Educación Superior Central España Republicana, CP 44280, Matanzas
  • Maikel Rodolfo Hernández-Aguilera Unidad de Extensión, Investigación y Capacitación Agropecuaria, Velazco, Holguín
  • Abel Peña-Alfonso Centro de Desarrollo Local, Gobierno Municipal de Manatí, Las Tunas
  • Guillermo González-Telles Filial Universitaria de Martí (Universidad de Matanzas), Martí, Matanzas

Abstract

The objective of the work is to make an analysis of the diverse innovation processes in the local integrated food and energy production in Cuban rural areas in the context of the Biomas-Cuba project1. For the identification and evaluation of the local innovation process in the integrated food and energy production (IFEP), three questions were established: 1) what innovation processes have been developed or introduced?, 2) What has the link consisted in?, and 3) Which have been the key learnings? The IFEP is promoted for the development of agroenergetic farms, which has been implemented in private farms, cooperatives and state farms, in 22 municipalities of six Cuban provinces. They concentrate two types of innovation: i) sowing and agronomic management of Jatropha curcas L. for biodiesel production, and ii) integration of biodigesters in animal and plant production farms. In addition, 176 biodigesters were designed and constructed, mainly fixed-dome ones, and two anaerobic lagoons covered with synthetic geomembrane. In the organizational context there was a link among research centers, municipal universities, governments and local state entities, and professional and farmer organizations. It is concluded that the promotion of local innovation processes in agroenergy, in Cuban municipalities, contributes to a new strategic approach for the IFEP from biomass in rural areas, in the framework of local innovation systems, with high participation of actors, open innovation processes and a science-productive sector-government link.

References

1. Castellacci, F. & Natera, J. M. Innovation, absorptive capacity and growth heterogeneity: development paths in Latin America 1970-2010. TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20150820. Oslo: Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, 2015a.
2. Castellacci, F. & Natera, J. M. The convergence paradox: the global evolution of national innovation systems. TIK Working Papers on Innovation Studies No. 20150821. Oslo: Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, 2015b.
3. Cepero, L.; Recio, A.; Palacios, A.; Iglesias, Y. & Suárez, J. Gasificación de biomasa para la producción de electricidad. En: J. Suárez y G. J. Martín, eds. La biomasa como fuente renovable de energía en el medio rural: La experiencia de Biomas-Cuba. Matanzas, Cuba: EEPF Indio Hatuey. p. 143-149, 2012.
4. Deakin, M. & Leydesdorff, L. The triple helix model of smart cities: a neo-evolutionary perspective. In: M. Deakin, ed. Smart cities: governing, modelling and analyzing the transition. London: Routledge. p. 134-149, 2014.
5. Gebhardt, Christiane. The spatial dimension of the triple helix: the city revisitedtowards a mode 3 model of innovation systems. Triple Helix. 2:11-14, 2015. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-015-0024-3
6. Guercini, Simone & Runfola, A. Actors' roles in interaction and innovation in local systems: a conceptual taxonomy. J. Bus. Ind. Marketing. 30 (3/4):269-278, 2015.
7. Leydesdorff, L.; Etzkowitz, H.; Ivanova, Inga & Meyer, M. The measurement of synergy in innovation systems: redundancy generation in a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Working Paper Series SWPS 2017-08. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 2017.
8. Machado, R.; Sotolongo, J. A. & Rodríguez, E. Caracterización de colecciones de oleaginosas útiles para la producción de biocombustible. En: J. Suárez and G. J. Martín, eds. La biomasa como fuente renovable de energía en el medio rural: La experiencia de Biomas-Cuba. Matanzas, Cuba: EEPF Indio Hatuey. p. 41-69, 2012.
9. Motoyama, Y. Long-term collaboration between university and industry: A case study of nanotechnology development in Japan. Technol. Soc. 36 (1):39-51, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.001.
10. Ramirez, M.; Bernal, Paloma; Clarke, I. & Hernandez, I. Distinguishing patterns of learning and inclusion through patterns of network formation in developing agricultural clusters. Working Paper Series SWPS 2014H20. United Kingdom: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 2014.
11. Saldaña, A. Integración regional y sistemas locales de innovación: desafíos para las MIPYMES. Una perspectiva desde México. Espacio Abierto Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología. 23 (4):629-642, 2014.
12. Sotolongo, J. A.; Suárez, J.; Martín, G. J.; Cala, Marlenis; Vigil, María; Toral, Odalys et al. Producción integrada de biodiésel y alimentos: la concepción de una tecnología agroindustrial apropiada para Cuba. En: J. Suárez and G. J. Martín, eds. La biomasa como fuente renovable de energía en el medio rural: La experiencia de Biomas-Cuba. Matanzas, Cuba: EEPF Indio Hatuey. p. 100-112, 2012.
13. Suárez, J. Informe final del proyecto Biomas-Cuba Fase II. Matanzas, Cuba: EEPF Indio Hatuey, 2017.
14. Suárez, J. & Martín, G. J., Eds. La biomasa como fuente renovable de energía en el medio rural: La experiencia de Biomas-Cuba. Matanzas, Cuba: EEPF Indio Hatuey, 2012.
15. Suárez, J.; Martín, G. J.; Sotolongo, J. A.; Rodríguez, E.; Savran, Valentina; Cepero, L. et al. Experiencias del proyecto Biomas-Cuba. Alternativas energéticas a partir de la biomasa en el medio rural cubano. Pastos y Forrajes. 34 (4):473-496, 2011.
16. Warda, P. & Johansson, B. Knowledge absorption in the development of export products. Paper No. 368. Estocolmo: Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, The Royal Institute of Technology, 2014.
17. West, J. & Lakhani, K. R. Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation. 15 (2):223-231, 2008.
18. West, J.; Salter, A.; Vanhaverbeke, W. & Chesbrough, H. W. Open innovation: the next decade. Res. Pol. 43 (5):805-811, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001.
19. Wu, J.; Zhuo, S. & Wu, Z. National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change. 121:238-250, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.014.
Published
2018-11-26
How to Cite
SUÁREZ-HERNÁNDEZ, Jesús et al. Innovation processes in local food and energy production in Cuban municipalities. Pastos y Forrajes, [S.l.], v. 41, n. 4, nov. 2018. ISSN 2078-8452. Available at: <https://payfo.ihatuey.cu/index.php?journal=pasto&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=2067>. Date accessed: 13 aug. 2021.
Section
Análisis y comentario